nanog mailing list archives
Re: SPEWS?
From: Simon Lyall <simon.lyall () ihug co nz>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 16:53:56 +1200 (NZST)
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, John Payne wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 09:58:57PM -0400, Geo. wrote:Why spamcop and not spews?My question is why a dnsbl that the *maintainer* of which says should not be used for production mail systems?Because it's a targetted dynamic solution for a dynamic problem and I believe it has a chance at working?You have more faith than the person behind that list?
Current thread:
- Re: SPEWS?, (continued)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- RE: SPEWS? Geo. (Jun 20)
- RE: SPEWS? Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? John Payne (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Geo. (Jun 20)
- e-mail blacklists (was Re: SPEWS?) J.D. Falk (Jun 20)
- Re: e-mail blacklists (was Re: SPEWS?) measl (Jun 20)
- Re: e-mail blacklists (was Re: SPEWS?) jlewis (Jun 20)
- Re: e-mail blacklists (was Re: SPEWS?) Martin Hannigan (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? John Payne (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Simon Lyall (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Greg A. Woods (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? JC Dill (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? up (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re[2]: SPEWS? Richard Welty (Jun 20)
- Supporting White Hats (Was SPEWS) measl (Jun 20)
- Re: Supporting White Hats (Was SPEWS) JC Dill (Jun 21)
- Re: Supporting White Hats (Was SPEWS) measl (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? Måns Nilsson (Jun 21)