nanog mailing list archives
Re: SPEWS?
From: woods () weird com (Greg A. Woods)
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:28:29 -0400 (EDT)
[ On Thursday, June 20, 2002 at 15:48:41 (-0700), John Payne wrote: ]
Subject: Re: SPEWS? On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 04:38:02PM -0400, Geo. wrote:I am a postmaster for a state wide ISP and we maintain our own blacklist along with usage of one other public blacklist, the spamcop blacklist. Why spamcop and not spews?My question is why a dnsbl that the *maintainer* of which says should not be used for production mail systems?
That's how you know bl.spamcop.net is a good and useful list! The maintainer(s) wouldn't use such a disclaimer if it wasn't. -- Greg A. Woods +1 416 218-0098; <gwoods () acm org>; <g.a.woods () ieee org>; <woods () robohack ca> Planix, Inc. <woods () planix com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods () weird com>
Current thread:
- RE: SPEWS?, (continued)
- RE: SPEWS? Geo. (Jun 20)
- RE: SPEWS? Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? John Payne (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Geo. (Jun 20)
- e-mail blacklists (was Re: SPEWS?) J.D. Falk (Jun 20)
- Re: e-mail blacklists (was Re: SPEWS?) measl (Jun 20)
- Re: e-mail blacklists (was Re: SPEWS?) jlewis (Jun 20)
- Re: e-mail blacklists (was Re: SPEWS?) Martin Hannigan (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? John Payne (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Simon Lyall (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Greg A. Woods (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? JC Dill (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? up (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re[2]: SPEWS? Richard Welty (Jun 20)
- Supporting White Hats (Was SPEWS) measl (Jun 20)
- Re: Supporting White Hats (Was SPEWS) JC Dill (Jun 21)
- Re: Supporting White Hats (Was SPEWS) measl (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? Måns Nilsson (Jun 21)