nanog mailing list archives
Re: PacBell Security/Abuse Contact
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:00:11 -0500 (EST)
"db" == David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com> writes:
db> Regarding securiy issues, I'd suggest working with db> UUNet/Worldcom (or whatever AS701 is called lately). db> I've seen some of their folks work closely with db> aggrieved victims of DDOS attacks. Historically, BBN/Genuity/GTE/Verizon/Genuity... and Alternet/UUNET/MFS/Worldcom have been consistently the most responsive to security issues. Of course, they each have their good days, and their bad days. MCI was good, AT&T is improving. The most common problem is different carriers have different views on what is a "security" issue. And they each have their quirks on how you reach their security people. Often Abuse, Security and Legal are different groups of people, and its up to the customer to figure out how to navigate the corporate org chart.
Current thread:
- Re: PacBell Security/Abuse contact, (continued)
- Re: PacBell Security/Abuse contact Walter Prue (Mar 25)
- RE: PacBell Security/Abuse contact Cheung, Rick (Mar 25)
- Re: PacBell Security/Abuse contact Jon Mansey (Mar 25)
- Re: PacBell Security/Abuse contact Patrick (Mar 25)
- RE: PacBell Security/Abuse contact Eric Whitehill (Mar 25)
- How to get better security people Sean Donelan (Mar 25)
- Re: How to get better security people batz (Mar 26)
- Re: How to get better security people E.B. Dreger (Mar 26)
- Re: PacBell Security/Abuse contact Jon Mansey (Mar 25)
- Re: PacBell Security/Abuse Contact Eric Brandwine (Mar 25)
- Re: PacBell Security/Abuse Contact Sean Donelan (Mar 25)
- RE: PacBell Security/Abuse contact Todd Suiter (Mar 25)