nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP and aggregation
From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph () istop com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 18:31:47 -0400 (EDT)
I was thinking of doing iBGP over my transit connections (with a couple of static routes so the iBGP works) AND over my inter-city circuit. Any reason why this won't work? -RalphThe loss of igp metric will make it untenable at best. Do it over a GRE tunnel, with your regular igp (isis, ospf, eigrp, or shudder rip).
As far as I can tell, GRE doesn't support fragmentation - i.e. encapsulation of a 1500-byte IP packet that results in a GRE packet larger than the interface MTU size. -Ralph
Current thread:
- Re: BGP and aggregation, (continued)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Andy Walden (May 11)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Ralph Doncaster (May 11)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen Griffin (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Andy Walden (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen Griffin (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Andy Walden (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Ralph Doncaster (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Andy Walden (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation E.B. Dreger (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen Griffin (May 13)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Ralph Doncaster (May 13)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Scott Granados (May 13)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Andy Walden (May 11)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Ralph Doncaster (May 11)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Scott Granados (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Ralph Doncaster (May 11)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen Griffin (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen J. Wilcox (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Scott Granados (May 12)