nanog mailing list archives
Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product
From: PJ <briareos () otherlands net>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 18:14:37 -0700
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:22:39PM -0700, PJ wrote:Even more, I would hate to see the advocation of a hostile reaction to what, so far, is not considered a crime.Feel free to go portscan some US military and federal interest networks, then. If it's not a crime, you shouldnt have any problems scanning them.
If it's a crime, someone should have no problem citing the code. If it's not a crime, than I am guilty of nothing and should have nothing to fear. Of course, in the present political climate, that's probably not the case, but it doesn't make it right. However, there is legal precident that port scanning is not illegal. There are always going to be people who are going to probe and poke, as long as there is no direct harm, who cares? Sorry, the days of people sitting in nice straight lines, only doing what you want them to do and only going where you want them to go are not yet upon us. http://online.securityfocus.com/news/126 PJ -- Aaron Gaudio "The fool finds ignorance all around him. The wise man finds ignorance within."
Current thread:
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product, (continued)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product PJ (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Dug Song (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Clayton Fiske (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Dan Hollis (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Johannes B. Ullrich (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product PJ (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Johannes B. Ullrich (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Dan Hollis (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Scott Francis (May 16)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Dan Hollis (May 16)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product PJ (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Dan Hollis (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Kevin Oberman (May 16)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product mval (May 16)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Scott Francis (May 16)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Scott Francis (May 16)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Clayton Fiske (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product PJ (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Clayton Fiske (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product E.B. Dreger (May 15)