nanog mailing list archives
Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 19:55:19 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
The usual response was it only affected the public exchange fabric, not any private point-to-point circuits between providers through the same facility.But if we're going to compare this to MAE Gigaswitch failures, shouldn't we be talking apples to apples and oranges to oranges?
No. The world has changed. If people are buying tangerines and grapefruit now, that's what we should be talking about, not apples and oranges. If most of today's Internet exchange is via private connections, those are the connections we should be looking at. The fine folks at Caimis and Caida have done some analysis, and identified the nodes which make up the "core" of the Internet. They've also identified the most connected "core" nodes. The good news is the network doesn't go non-linear until more than 25% of the nodes are removed.
Current thread:
- Re: PAIX, (continued)
- Re: PAIX Vadim Antonov (Nov 16)
- Re: PAIX Petri Helenius (Nov 16)
- Re: PAIX Vadim Antonov (Nov 16)
- Re: PAIX Paul Vixie (Nov 16)
- Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Sean Donelan (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Sean Donelan (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Steve Feldman (Nov 17)
- Re: PAIX Petri Helenius (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Sean Donelan (Nov 17)
- Re: PAIX Vadim Antonov (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Jesper Skriver (Nov 17)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Nov 18)
- Re: PAIX Daniel Golding (Nov 18)
- Re: PAIX Daniel Golding (Nov 18)
- Re: PAIX Paul Vixie (Nov 18)