nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T NYC
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 16:39:17 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 alex () yuriev com wrote:
That is why their route is *nailed* via BGP to the router that *always* provide connectivity to them. If they have to move, BGP injectors are your friends. Takes seconds.
Talking about things that take seconds: would you mind sharing your BGP hold time values with us? Iljitsch van Beijnum
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T NYC, (continued)
- Re: AT&T NYC Jesper Skriver (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC bdragon (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Petri Helenius (Sep 02)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 02)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- RE: AT&T NYC Feger, James (Sep 03)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC bdragon (Sep 03)