nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T NYC
From: alex () yuriev com
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 15:00:20 -0400 (EDT)
And that: you don't use "closest-exit" at all, but haul traffic, wherever, around your network based upon steps below the igp-metric step in the bgp decision tree?That's the part I can't figure out without some lab time either, but obviously you can tweak this setup to _statically_ do whatever it is you need, the only question is what happens when something goes down.
route-map internal-link permit 10 match blah set metric +10 do blah Alex
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T NYC, (continued)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 02)
- Re: AT&T NYC bdragon (Sep 02)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 02)
- Re: AT&T NYC Clayton Fiske (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Jesper Skriver (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Jesper Skriver (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 02)
- Re: AT&T NYC bdragon (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 03)