nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture
From: Brandon Ross <bross () sockeye com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:16:59 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Peter E. Fry wrote:
Apparently your skeweree was insufficiently armored -- an obvious design flaw.
LOL, indeed.
Where do you draw the line? Probability trees aside, you design your system and take your chances.
Of course, you just do the best you can do with the budget that you have and the business requirements. To date I haven't seen a significant benefit to using an integrated redundant device, all things considered. -- Brandon Ross AIM: BrandonNR VP Operations ICQ: 2269442 Sockeye Networks
Current thread:
- Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture Pete Kruckenberg (Apr 09)
- Re: Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture Neil J. McRae (Apr 10)
- Re: Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture Brandon Ross (Apr 10)
- Re: Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture Peter E. Fry (Apr 10)
- Re: Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture Brandon Ross (Apr 10)
- Re: Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture Brandon Ross (Apr 10)
- Re: Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture Neil J. McRae (Apr 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture Jim Deleskie (Apr 10)