nanog mailing list archives
Re: Blocking port 135?
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <chris () UU NET>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 19:22:13 +0000 (GMT)
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Sean Donelan wrote:
In reality blocking port 135 is almost never sufficient. Its slightly better than waving a dead chicken over your PC.
its far less stinky than the chicken option though, you must admit that.
Current thread:
- Blocking port 135? Adi Linden (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Sean Donelan (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? bmanning (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Richard Irving (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Sean Donelan (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Jack Bates (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Sean Donelan (Aug 01)
- RE: Blocking port 135? Adi Linden (Aug 01)
- RE: Blocking port 135? Jason Robertson (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Bruce Pinsky (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Jason Slagle (Aug 02)