nanog mailing list archives
Re: Blocking port 135?
From: Jason Slagle <raistlin () tacorp net>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 10:12:05 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Bruce Pinsky wrote:
And filtering 445 in the outbound direction to prevent attacks from the inside out is probably prudent as well.
Unfortunatly I've ran into at least 1 rather big example of a company using 445 for SSL since they wanted to put more then 1 cert on a machine. In this case it was a check clearing house, and a bank couldn't reach them because their ISP was filtering their T1. Jason -- Jason Slagle - CCNP - CCDP /"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign . X - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . / \ - NO Word docs in e-mail .
Current thread:
- Re: Blocking port 135?, (continued)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? bmanning (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Richard Irving (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Sean Donelan (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Jack Bates (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 01)
- RE: Blocking port 135? Adi Linden (Aug 01)
- RE: Blocking port 135? Jason Robertson (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Bruce Pinsky (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Jason Slagle (Aug 02)
- RE: Blocking port 135? Bob German (Aug 02)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Justin Shore (Aug 03)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Jack Bates (Aug 02)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Mans Nilsson (Aug 02)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Sean Donelan (Aug 02)