nanog mailing list archives
Re: Authority
From: "Tom (UnitedLayer)" <tom () unitedlayer com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:22:27 -0800 (PST)
I think that most people with clue will realize that every time he mentions or posts something thats about 50-90% innacurate, he damages his own credibility anyways. A lot of the stuff I've seen in regard to this issue is almost comical, and I wonder who picked on him so badly that he decided to lash out this way. Frankly, I think his vitriol would be better directed at those who defraud their upstream ISPs, as that hurts the community more than some hijacked unused IP space.
Current thread:
- Re: Authority, (continued)
- Re: Authority Paul (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority trelane (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority Christian Malo (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority Jeff S Wheeler (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority Richard Cox (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority trelane (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority Paul (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority Blaxthos (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority jon bennett (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority Tom (UnitedLayer) (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority william (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority Henry Linneweh (Dec 10)
- Root Authority Doug Luce (Dec 15)
- Re: Root Authority Randy Bush (Dec 15)
- Re: Root Authority bill (Dec 15)
- Re: Root Authority Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 15)
- Re: Root Authority Joe Abley (Dec 15)