nanog mailing list archives
Re: MTU path discovery and IPSec
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:43:59 -0500
Joe Maimon wrote:
Tony Rall wrote:On Wednesday, 2003-12-03 at 09:38 PST, David Sinn <dsinn () dsinn com> wrote:<snipped> <snipped>I was
wondering would it not be wiser for fraggers to frag in half instead of just the overflow?<snip>
I noticed today this URL http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feature_guide09186a0080115533.html Interesting part down on the page: Uniform FragmentationPackets are fragmented into equally sized units to prevent further downstream fragmentation.
Tony Rall
Current thread:
- Re: MTU path discovery and IPSec, (continued)
- Re: MTU path discovery and IPSec Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 04)
- Re: MTU path discovery and IPSec Barney Wolff (Dec 04)
- Re: MTU path discovery and IPSec Joe Maimon (Dec 04)
- Re: MTU path discovery and IPSec Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 04)
- Re: MTU path discovery and IPSec Joe Maimon (Dec 04)
- Re: MTU path discovery and IPSec Crist Clark (Dec 04)
- Re: MTU path discovery and IPSec Joe Maimon (Dec 04)
- Re: MTU path discovery and IPSec Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Dec 04)
- Re: MTU path discovery and IPSec Joe Maimon (Dec 04)
- Re: MTU path discovery and IPSec Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 04)
- Re: MTU path discovery and IPSec Joe Maimon (Dec 10)
- Re: MTU path discovery and IPSec Barney Wolff (Dec 10)