nanog mailing list archives
Re: Extreme spam testing
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () kotovnik com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:52:14 -0800 (PST)
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Andy Dills wrote:
Hmm...actually, YOUR spam is MY problem. That's how this works. I applaud njabl.
Then you've never been on receiving end of their (and their ilk) viligantine "justice" for no reason other than being in the same block of addresses as some hacked windoze host (NOT on your network, mind you) and using business-grade DSL. I wish you have an opportunity to try that being YOUR problem, _then_ we'll hear your opinion on spam nazi. Oh, and I usually get it fixed by forcing postmasters on receiving end to stop using offending lists, sometimes by forging "spam" from them (yes, Virginia, the one-way TCP hack works) - when it's for some reason important to me to communicate with their customer, and the a*le running the mailserver is immune to reason. --vadim
Current thread:
- Re: Extreme spam testing, (continued)
- Re: Extreme spam testing Chris Brenton (Dec 22)
- Re: Extreme spam testing Niels Bakker (Dec 22)
- Re: Extreme spam testing Andy Dills (Dec 22)
- Re: Extreme spam testing Chris Brenton (Dec 22)
- Re: Extreme spam testing Paul Vixie (Dec 23)
- Re: Extreme spam testing Andy Dills (Dec 23)
- Re: Extreme spam testing Paul (Dec 23)
- Re: Extreme spam testing Andy Dills (Dec 23)
- Re: Extreme spam testing Paul (Dec 23)
- Re: Extreme spam testing Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 22)
- Re: Extreme spam testing Vadim Antonov (Dec 22)
- Re: Extreme spam testing Andy Dills (Dec 22)
- Re: Extreme spam testing Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 22)