nanog mailing list archives

scope of the 69/8 problem


From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 23:22:54 +0000 (GMT)


FS> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 17:41:56 -0500
FS> From: Frank Scalzo


FS> Moving all root-servers WOULD fix the problem. Although I
FS> doubt anyone is really going to be willing to make the news
FS> by causing that much of an outage.

I'm eager to see stats indicating how large the problem is.  If
the problem is this severe, it seems all the more wrong to let
innocent third parties suffer due to what IP space was bestowed
upon them.

If the roots and gTLDs are truly unwilling to help, and a handful
of entities can't cooperate, I have serious concerns why they
have been handed responsibility for such a critical piece of
infrastructure.  I'd expect "it's too hard to be a good netizen"
whining on other lists... but NANOG?  Roots and TLDs?

Perhaps this is an omen of the Internet yet to come.  Oh joy.


Eddy
--
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist () brics com>
To: blacklist () brics com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist () brics com>, or you are likely to
be blocked.


Current thread: