nanog mailing list archives
Re: 69/8...this sucks
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:16:35 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:46:33 +0000 From: Michael.Dillon
I have suggested that ARIN should set up an LDAP server to publish the delegation of all their IP address space updated
Not bad, but will the lazy ISPs set up an LDAP server to track changes they aren't tracking now? Will those with erroneous filters magically change simply because of LDAP? I still contend the answer is is a boot to the head that screams to them, "Update your freaking filters!" Eddy -- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <blacklist () brics com> To: blacklist () brics com Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <blacklist () brics com>, or you are likely to be blocked.
Current thread:
- Re: 69/8...this sucks, (continued)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Doug Barton (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Doug Barton (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 11)
- Bogon and anti-spoof filters Simon Brilus (Mar 11)
- Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Neil J. McRae (Mar 11)
- Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Simon Brilus (Mar 11)
- Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Jack Bates (Mar 11)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks Rob Thomas (Mar 10)
- scope of the 69/8 problem E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: scope of the 69/8 problem Stephen Sprunk (Mar 11)
- Re: scope of the 69/8 problem jlewis (Mar 11)
- Re: scope of the 69/8 problem bdragon (Mar 19)