nanog mailing list archives
Re: OpenSSL
From: Scott Francis <darkuncle () darkuncle net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 17:18:23 -0800
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 12:55:24PM -0500, smb () research att com said:
In message <20030317173458.GC9680 () darkuncle net>, Scott Francis writes:Fun is about all it comes to. See what Schneier had to say in the most recent crypto-gram regarding this hole. <http://www.counterpane.com/crypto-gram-0303.html>This is a new attack, not the one Schneier was talking about. It's very elegant work -- they actually implemented an attack that can recover the long-term private key. The only caveat is that their attack currently works on LANs, not WANs, because they need more precise timing than is generally feasible over the Internet.
Hm, mea culpa. I read the title without digging very far into the actual announcements and thought it a rehash of the earlier holes. Thanks for clearing it up for me. -- Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net illum oportet crescere me autem minui
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- OpenSSL Len Rose (Mar 17)
- Re: OpenSSL Scott Francis (Mar 17)
- Re: OpenSSL Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 17)
- Re: OpenSSL Scott Francis (Mar 17)
- Re: OpenSSL Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OpenSSL Stewart, William C (Bill), SALES (Mar 17)
- Re: OpenSSL Michael . Dillon (Mar 18)
- Re: OpenSSL Eric Rescorla (Mar 18)
- Re: OpenSSL alex (Mar 18)
- Re: OpenSSL Petri Helenius (Mar 18)
- Re: OpenSSL alex (Mar 18)
- Re: OpenSSL Eric Rescorla (Mar 18)
- Re: OpenSSL Eric Rescorla (Mar 18)
- Re: OpenSSL Scott Francis (Mar 17)
- RE: OpenSSL alex (Mar 18)
- Re: OpenSSL Petri Helenius (Mar 18)