nanog mailing list archives
RE: OpenSSL
From: alex () yuriev com
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 11:57:05 -0500 (EST)
MPLS (on its own) gives you jack-squat in terms of delay and jitter. All the clever queuing can do it for you - but then it can for IP (because its the same thing!).
As Eric stated in his previous message, I have not realized that his point was that even one machine that has an ethernet connection directly to the SSL-enabled service, the SSL timing attack is possible. Of course, such setup is the most common way of connecting systems with SSL-enabled services to the internet. Alex
Current thread:
- Re: OpenSSL, (continued)
- Re: OpenSSL Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 17)
- Re: OpenSSL Scott Francis (Mar 17)
- Re: OpenSSL Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 17)
- Re: OpenSSL Stewart, William C (Bill), SALES (Mar 17)
- Re: OpenSSL Michael . Dillon (Mar 18)
- Re: OpenSSL Eric Rescorla (Mar 18)
- Re: OpenSSL alex (Mar 18)
- Re: OpenSSL Petri Helenius (Mar 18)
- Re: OpenSSL alex (Mar 18)
- Re: OpenSSL Eric Rescorla (Mar 18)
- Re: OpenSSL Eric Rescorla (Mar 18)
- RE: OpenSSL alex (Mar 18)
- Re: OpenSSL Petri Helenius (Mar 18)