nanog mailing list archives
Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 16:57:19 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Dan Armstrong wrote:
Or we could all take a page from the book of telecom, and run with DC systems.
They suck too, just in different ways.
Current thread:
- Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC), (continued)
- Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) Timothy Brown (May 29)
- Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) Pete Ehlke (May 29)
- Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) Joel Jaeggli (May 29)
- Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) Arman (May 29)
- Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) nicholas harteau (May 29)
- Re: UPS failure modes Jack Bates (May 29)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) Alex Rubenstein (May 29)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) Dan Armstrong (May 29)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) Sean Donelan (May 29)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) Sean Donelan (May 29)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) E.B. Dreger (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) Kevin Day (May 29)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes Jack Bates (May 29)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes Dan Hollis (May 29)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes Stephen Sprunk (May 29)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes Dan Hollis (May 30)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes Joel Jaeggli (May 30)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes Dan Hollis (May 30)