nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISPs' willingness to take action
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <chris () UU NET>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 20:27:32 +0000 (GMT)
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, E.B. Dreger wrote:
"What's an open relay?"
thats not really covered in the exchange test... and +I doesn't require exchange test, nor does MCSE...
Exact quote from a local MCSE-happy "consultancy". I expect there are other such screwballs installing trouble elsewhere. OT: Does MCSE+I address real operational issues?
only if your operation requires MCSE and I I suppose... Who would do that nutty thing? Oh... most of the "I" :( bummer.
Current thread:
- RE: ISPs' willingness to take action, (continued)
- RE: ISPs' willingness to take action Charles Sprickman (Oct 26)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action matt (Oct 27)
- RE: ISPs' willingness to take action Charles Sprickman (Oct 26)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS (Oct 26)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Niels Bakker (Oct 27)
- RE: ISPs' willingness to take action Bob German (Oct 27)
- RE: ISPs' willingness to take action Eric Kuhnke (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Alan Spicer (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action kenw (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Matthew Sullivan (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action E.B. Dreger (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 27)
- RE: ISPs' willingness to take action John Ferriby (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action kenw (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Richard Irving (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action William Devine, II (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Brian Bruns (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Brian Bruns (Oct 27)