nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign's public opinion play
From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 18:34:44 +0100 (BST)
we're only upset because Verisign makes money off of this.
I'm sure that is a factor too. Verisign have a contract to operate a shared registry, as a monopoly is unreasonable, but hijack it to make a different service that nobody else gets to bid for running. If such a service were a feasible use of this public resource there'd be an open process to bid for running it and some of the rewards would go to public services in return for that lease brandon
Current thread:
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play, (continued)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Michael . Dillon (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Michael . Dillon (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Kee Hinckley (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play William Allen Simpson (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play doug (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Kee Hinckley (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Owen DeLong (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Kee Hinckley (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Brandon Butterworth (Oct 07)