nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign's public opinion play
From: Kee Hinckley <nazgul () somewhere com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 15:38:07 -0400
At 10:00 AM -0700 10/7/03, Owen DeLong wrote:
development, but, I think whatever comes out should be brought back here for review before being launched at the press as a statement of community position. I think it should also be taken to other similar lists and
The recently posted "LINX Letter to ICANN regarding Verisign" was an excellent example of the kind of thing that might be done.
-- Kee Hinckley http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate everyone else's.
Current thread:
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play, (continued)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play George William Herbert (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Michael . Dillon (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Michael . Dillon (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Kee Hinckley (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play William Allen Simpson (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play doug (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Kee Hinckley (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Owen DeLong (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Kee Hinckley (Oct 07)
- Re: Verisign's public opinion play Brandon Butterworth (Oct 07)