nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet privacy
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 16:38:51 -0400
In a message written on Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 01:22:12PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
What valid reason is there for allowing a domain owner to be unlisted and uncontactable. If you want to remain anonymous, then you don't need a domain.
It is possible to be anonymous and contactable. Is that that good enough (for domains, IP allocations, or other things served up via whois)? Is it key we know the owners real identity, or just know enough information to be able to contact them? -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Internet privacy Allen McRay (Oct 01)
- Re: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 01)
- Re: Internet privacy Martin J. Levy (Oct 01)
- Re: Internet privacy Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Martin J. Levy (Oct 01)
- Re: Internet privacy Jack Bates (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Jeffrey Meltzer (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Jack Bates (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Leo Bicknell (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Lyndon Nerenberg (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Lyndon Nerenberg (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Jeffrey Meltzer (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Matt Levine (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 01)
- Re: Internet privacy Richard Cox (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Booth, Michael (ENG) (Oct 03)
- Re: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 03)