nanog mailing list archives
RE: Internet privacy
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon () orthanc ab ca>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 15:07:32 -0600
Think about it, if you allow the registrar (who has the ultimate obligation to pull the domain) to instead obscure their contact for a fee, then, you have essentially eliminated any such protection.
That would depend on the terms of the contract between you and the registrar. But I do agree that this would be better served by a neutral third party (who would probably charge a lot less than a lawyer would).
No matter who you go with for the service, read the fine print before you sign on the line ...
--lyndon
Current thread:
- Re: Internet privacy, (continued)
- Re: Internet privacy Martin J. Levy (Oct 01)
- Re: Internet privacy Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Martin J. Levy (Oct 01)
- Re: Internet privacy Jack Bates (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Jeffrey Meltzer (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Jack Bates (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Leo Bicknell (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Lyndon Nerenberg (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Lyndon Nerenberg (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Jeffrey Meltzer (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Matt Levine (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Richard Cox (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Booth, Michael (ENG) (Oct 03)
- Re: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 03)