nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Class A Data Center"
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 15:55:13 -0500
andrew2 () one net wrote:
Particularly of interest would be "established standards" for "Class A Datacenter" specifically relating to the physical plant -- Power, cooling, physical security, etc. I think we can all agree in general on N+1 everything, and we can go round and round again on what exactly constitutes "Tier-1 provider," but what about the physical space itself? I can put a fully-redundant network with multiple "Tier-1" connections in my garage but I still wouldn't consider my garage to then be a "Class A Datacenter."
And let's not forget that they need to have good staffing, especially the abuse department.
-Jack
Current thread:
- "Class A Data Center" Bob German (Sep 18)
- Re: "Class A Data Center" Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 18)
- Re: "Class A Data Center" Jay Hennigan (Sep 18)
- RE: "Class A Data Center" Bob German (Sep 18)
- RE: "Class A Data Center" andrew2 (Sep 18)
- Re: "Class A Data Center" Jack Bates (Sep 18)
- Re: "Class A Data Center" Scott Francis (Sep 24)
- Re: "Class A Data Center" Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 24)
- Re: "Class A Data Center" Owen DeLong (Sep 24)
- Re: "Class A Data Center" Jay Hennigan (Sep 18)
- Message not available
- Re: "Class A Data Center" Scott Francis (Sep 24)
- Re: "Class A Data Center" Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 18)