nanog mailing list archives
Re: Packet anonymity is the problem?
From: Todd Vierling <tv () duh org>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:18:20 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Sean Donelan wrote: : "Because of the way TCP/IP works, it's an open network," Keromytis : said. "Other network technologies don't have that problem. They have : other issues, but only IP is subject to this difficulty with abuse." If networks properly filtered the source IP's of packets exiting or entering their networks to only the valid delegations for that network, this would be far less of a problem: we could at least get *some* accountability going. Of course, the still high number of bogon routes illustrate that very few folks (if any) really care. -- -- Todd Vierling <tv () duh org> <tv () pobox com>
Current thread:
- Packet anonymity is the problem? Sean Donelan (Apr 10)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Todd Vierling (Apr 10)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Dan Hollis (Apr 10)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Paul Vixie (Apr 10)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Joe Provo (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Petri Helenius (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Joe Maimon (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Jeff Workman (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Joe Maimon (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Jeff Workman (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Todd Vierling (Apr 10)