nanog mailing list archives

RE: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit

From: "Michel Py" <michel () arneill-py sacramento ca us>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 19:45:46 -0700

Peering?  Who needs peering if transit can be
had for $20 per megabit per second?


The smaller guys that don't buy transit buy the gigabit.

Michel.

Current thread:

Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Gordon Cook (Apr 19)
- Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Michel Py (Apr 19)
  - Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 19)
  - Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Paul Vixie (Apr 19)
    - Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit vijay gill (Apr 20)
- RE: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Michel Py (Apr 19)
  - Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Daniel Golding (Apr 20)
    - Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)
    - TCP Vulnerability makes case for authenticated BGP tad pedley (Apr 20)
    - Re: TCP Vulnerability makes case for authenticated BGP Pekka Savola (Apr 20)
    - Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 20)
    - Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)

(Thread continues...)