nanog mailing list archives

Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit

From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 20 Apr 2004 05:15:48 +0000

Peering?  Who needs peering if transit can be
had for $20 per megabit per second?


anyone whose applications are too important to risk dependency on OPNs
(other people's networks).
-- 
Paul Vixie

Current thread:

Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Gordon Cook (Apr 19)
- Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Michel Py (Apr 19)
  - Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 19)
  - Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Paul Vixie (Apr 19)
    - Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit vijay gill (Apr 20)
- RE: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Michel Py (Apr 19)
  - Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Daniel Golding (Apr 20)
    - Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)
    - TCP Vulnerability makes case for authenticated BGP tad pedley (Apr 20)
    - Re: TCP Vulnerability makes case for authenticated BGP Pekka Savola (Apr 20)
    - Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 20)
    - Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)
    - IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) Blaine Christian (Apr 20)
    - Re: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 22)

(Thread continues...)