nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions?
From: Jason Dixon <jason () dixongroup net>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 12:49:21 -0400
On Apr 5, 2004, at 10:49 AM, Andy Johnson wrote:
Has anyone had any experience with this device? Turntide.com. Looks like atraffic-shaping device designed specifically for cutting down spammersthroughput to your inbound SMTP servers. My main concern is, how does it make the distinction between legitimate mass-mailings (e.g.: mailing lists such as this one), and spam? Interesting approach to killing spam though Imust say.
You might want to consider an inexpensive mail relay running OpenBSD's spamd (not to be confused with SpamAssassin's spamd) in conjunction with PF. Spamd is really nice for hurting spammers and/or relays where it can... in their spool. Granted, it's based on address lists like spamhaus or spews, but it's better than content filtering in one very important way... bandwidth savings. With content filtering, the payload is already at your doorstep.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=spamd http://www.benzedrine.cx/relaydb.html -- Jason Dixon, RHCE DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net
Current thread:
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions?, (continued)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Michael . Dillon (Apr 07)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Erik Haagsman (Apr 07)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Dave Howe (Apr 07)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Erik Haagsman (Apr 07)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Dan Hollis (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Petri Helenius (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Dan Hollis (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Petri Helenius (Apr 06)