nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath
From: "Tom (UnitedLayer)" <tom () unitedlayer com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 20:02:23 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote:
Not all L3-switches are flow-based; prefix-based ones should do just fine. Can people add/correct this initial list ? Flow-based: Foundry with IronCore modules, Cisco Catalyst 6500 with Sup1(A) Prefix-based: Foundry with JetCore modules, Cisco Catalyst 6500/7600 with Sup2(A), Sup3(A/BXL)
The 2948G-L3 and the 4908G-L3 I believe are Prefix/ASIC based. I believe the 3550-EMI is as well, but I'm not familiar with that equipment.
Current thread:
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath, (continued)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Paul Vixie (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath haesu (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Donovan Hill (Jan 20)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Jan 20)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 20)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Donovan Hill (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Tom (UnitedLayer) (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 20)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Tom (UnitedLayer) (Jan 20)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath John Lyons (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Rafi Sadowsky (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath sthaug (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 21)