nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:54:13 +0100 (CET)
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Rafi Sadowsky wrote:
As for the 3550-EMI "real life" experience as a 10/100 BT aggregation switch wasn't affected(CPU <5%) at all by rather aggressive scanning but did generate around 11 Mb/sec of ARP requests on all the 100Mb/sec ports in the same VLAN and totally killed connectivity to legacy equipment connected at 10 Mb/s ...
In my experience, a few megs of broadcast that a 7206VXR handled fairly well totally killed off a 3550. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath, (continued)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Donovan Hill (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Tom (UnitedLayer) (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 20)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Tom (UnitedLayer) (Jan 20)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath John Lyons (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Rafi Sadowsky (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath sthaug (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 21)