nanog mailing list archives

RE: MS is vulnerable

From: "Matthew Kaufman" <matthew () eeph com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:31:58 -0800

This MS v Unix debate is a very interesting discussion.


To some of you. To others of us, it is a long-dead horse.

However, I'd like to take a moment to inject my observations.


I'd like the NANOG list to be restricted to Network Operations issues, or at
the very least, Network Operations plus the politics and ranting thereof.

Matthew Kaufman
matthew () eeph com

Current thread:

Re: MS is vulnerable Michael . Dillon (Jan 29)
- RE: MS is vulnerable Christopher J. Wolff (Jan 29)
  - RE: MS is vulnerable Matthew Kaufman (Jan 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: MS is vulnerable Michel Py (Jan 29)
  - Re: MS is vulnerable Jonathan Nichols (Jan 29)
    - RE: MS is vulnerable Vivien M. (Jan 29)
    - Strange 192.168. UDP/138 Traffic Darrell Kristof (Jan 29)
    - Re: Strange 192.168. UDP/138 Traffic Richard Welty (Jan 29)
  - Re: MS is vulnerable Jason Lixfeld (Jan 29)
- RE: MS is vulnerable Michel Py (Jan 29)
- RE: MS is vulnerable Gregory Hicks (Jan 29)
- RE: MS is vulnerable Michel Py (Jan 29)
  - Re: MS is vulnerable Jonathan Nichols (Jan 29)

(Thread continues...)