nanog mailing list archives
Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?]
From: Michael.Dillon () radianz com
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 10:40:10 +0100
In any case, I am going to pull a randy here and strongly encourage my competitors to deploy this "ethernet over ceiling tile" engineering methodology.
Funny thing is, that there are lots of competitors doing what randy "strongly encourages" them to do and they stay in business. I think it's all a question of scale. If you are at the top end of the scale or if you seriously intend to get to the top end of the scale, then it's good to be anal about these things and strive for the absolute best practice and most scalable engineering. On the other hand there is limited room at the top and most people are happy to run a business on a somewhat smaller scale. One size does not fit all. --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: concern over public peering points, (continued)
- Re: concern over public peering points Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 05)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] joe mcguckin (Jul 05)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] vijay gill (Jul 05)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Patrick W Gilmore (Jul 05)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Tony Li (Jul 05)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Patrick W Gilmore (Jul 05)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Michael . Dillon (Jul 06)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Paul Vixie (Jul 05)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] vijay gill (Jul 05)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Paul Vixie (Jul 05)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Michael . Dillon (Jul 06)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Leo Bicknell (Jul 06)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] vijay gill (Jul 06)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 06)
- RE: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Mark Borchers (Jul 06)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 08)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 08)
- RE: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Ian Dickinson (Jul 08)
- RE: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Scott McGrath (Jul 09)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 08)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Patrick Muldoon (Jul 08)