nanog mailing list archives
Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses.
From: "Wayne E. Bouchard" <web () typo org>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 20:01:22 -0700
I can tell you that at least with my customers, the term "class C" is only used to clarify what is meant by "slash 24" and always with the phrase "is the equivilant to" And a bit surprisingly, I'm having to explain this less and less. Even the sales team is learning to speak CIDR. So there is indeed hope. On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 02:44:22AM +0000, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
Amen, brother. - ferg -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> wrote: Do you part to help control the ignorant population: whenever you hear someone say "class [ABC]" in reference to anything other than a historical allocation, smack them. Hard. -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg () netzero net or fergdawg () sbcglobal net
--- Wayne Bouchard web () typo org Network Dude http://www.typo.org/~web/
Current thread:
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses., (continued)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. sthaug (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Petri Helenius (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Stephen Sprunk (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. sthaug (Jun 27)
- RE: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Chris Ranch (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Jonathan McDowell (Jun 27)
- RE: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Tony Hain (Jun 28)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Bob Snyder (Jun 28)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Peter Corlett (Jun 29)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 29)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Jonathan McDowell (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Wayne E. Bouchard (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Paul G (Jun 26)