nanog mailing list archives
Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses.
From: rsnyder () toontown erial nj us (Bob Snyder)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:05:57 -0400
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:41:50AM -0700, Tony Hain wrote:
While it is often great sport to poke at MS, did you consider that this might have nothing to do with classfullness or CIDR? I believe you will find that 0 & -1 are invalid for whatever netmask the windows stack is given. You
So you're saying that with 10.200.200.0/22, that 10.200.201.0, 10.200.202.0 and 10.200.203.0 are invalid host addresses? Setting up DHCP scopes for this space must be painful. Not to mention use of /32 addressing for loopbacks. I could almost forgive not handling /31 given that RFC3021 was onlyu published in 12/2000. Bob
Current thread:
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses., (continued)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Jared Mauch (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. william(at)elan.net (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Jared Mauch (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Howard C. Berkowitz (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. sthaug (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Petri Helenius (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Stephen Sprunk (Jun 27)
- RE: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Chris Ranch (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Jonathan McDowell (Jun 27)
- RE: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Tony Hain (Jun 28)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Bob Snyder (Jun 28)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Peter Corlett (Jun 29)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 29)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Jonathan McDowell (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Wayne E. Bouchard (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Paul G (Jun 26)