nanog mailing list archives

RE: IT security people sleep well


From: "Jason Frisvold" <friz () corp ptd net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 22:31:59 -0400


-----Original Message-----
From: Edward B. Dreger [mailto:eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net] 

Correct.  One must shell out more money for a bigger feature set
to obtain SSH.  I don't recall specifics off the top of my head,
and don't have a javascript-cable machine handy to use Feature
Navigator[*], but certain { feature sets | trains } only support
SSHv1.

I don't see why they can't roll it into every ios that runs on a router
capable of ssh.  Ssh and sshd on my linux system barely break 500k
compiled... And there's a TON of functionality in there that isn't
required on a router.  It would seem that you could get ssh put into
these code trains in under 500k ...

Personally, I like having a little wiggle room in the flash ...  Putting
an image on there that occupies the entire flash is a bad thing...
 
[*] Quick gripe: Did anyone at Cisco ever consider that people
    might like to use Feature Navigator without javascript?
    What's next?  Mandatory Flash Player?

I concur..  Mandatory Javascript sucks...  Esp when Mozilla and Firefox
have problems viewing the pages...  Cisco's site became decidedly
un-useful when they switched it over to this new design...

Eddy

Jason Frisvold
Penteledata


Current thread: