nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamhaus Exposed
From: "Peter Galbavy" <peter.galbavy () knowtion net>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:34:04 -0000
up () 3 am wrote:
PS: Without Satan, there would be no Internet for you to express your considered opions on.
So the work at the University of London was just incidental ? Peter
Current thread:
- US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed), (continued)
- US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Joshua Brady (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Peter Galbavy (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Dave Howe (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) William Warren (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Henry Linneweh (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Jason Slagle (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Peter Galbavy (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Bill Woodcock (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed John Payne (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Peter Galbavy (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Sam Stickland (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Paul Jakma (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Jim Popovitch (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Paul Jakma (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Mar 18)
- Re: Tracing packets (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Andrew - Supernews (Mar 17)