Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested

[Randy Bush <randy () psg com>]

> I see this a lot recently: You are mixing up RfC1918 and NAT.
>
> If I have globally unique addresses I can NAT them as well
> as 10/8. One has nothing to do with the other. 
>
> Having to NAT RfC1918 addresses to reach the internet, does not imply
> that I have to have RfC1918 to be able to do NAT.

but having 1918, site-loco, whatever, and wanting to reach the
internet REQUIRES nat.  we'll love it in ipv6; can't let things
be too simple, eh?

randy