nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 09:14:19 -0800
FWIW, I think TLS is a cleaner approach than SSL, but, otherwise, I agree with Iljitsch. Owen
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- KAME on IPv4? (was: Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?), (continued)
- KAME on IPv4? (was: Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?) Crist Clark (Nov 12)
- Re: KAME on IPv4? (was: Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?) Jeroen Massar (Nov 14)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Paul Vixie (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Owen DeLong (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Daniel Roesen (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Owen DeLong (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Henning Brauer (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Henning Brauer (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Henning Brauer (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Owen DeLong (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Alexei Roudnev (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 12)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Randy Bush (Nov 11)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 11)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Adi Linden (Nov 15)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 15)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Måns Nilsson (Nov 11)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Randy Bush (Nov 11)
- RE: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Tony Hain (Nov 11)