nanog mailing list archives
Re: EFF whitepaper
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:44:32 -0800
On 11/15/04, Steven Champeon <schampeo () hesketh com> wrote:
That said, I've long since stopped listening (or contributing) to the EFF as I see their war on antispammers as counterproductive. John Gilmore runs a well-known open relay at toad.com, and for some reason thinks that free, anonymous speech is important enough to let spammers drown it out through sheer volume. I prefer having usable email, so I no longer support the EFF.
While I continue to be saddened by this, I have to agree. The EFF has done amazing, necessary work on so many issues, and I thank them for that -- but they've been blaming the wrong people regarding spam for many years. -- J.D. Falk okay, what's next? <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Current thread:
- EFF whitepaper Sean Donelan (Nov 14)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Paul Vixie (Nov 14)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Steven Champeon (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper J.D. Falk (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Tom (UnitedLayer) (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Steven Champeon (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Tom (UnitedLayer) (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Steven Champeon (Nov 15)
- Staying on topic (was Re: EFF whitepaper) Steve Gibbard (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Rich Kulawiec (Nov 16)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Paul G (Nov 16)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 16)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Steven Champeon (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Paul Vixie (Nov 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: EFF whitepaper Peering (Nov 15)