nanog mailing list archives
Re: EFF whitepaper
From: "Tom (UnitedLayer)" <tom () unitedlayer com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:06:09 -0800 (PST)
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Steven Champeon wrote:
John Gilmore runs a well-known open relay at toad.com, and for some reason thinks that free, anonymous speech is important enough to let spammers drown it out through sheer volume.
Someone famous said something about paying a high price for free speech, I think this perhaps would fall under that category. Mr Gilmore spends quite a bit of time tending to his mail server to ensure that spammers do not abuse it. Any spammer who spends time pumping mail through his server is going to realize quite quickly that its not worth their time. Its a very old slow machine on a T1 with other intentional slowdowns added to the MTA, and some amount of spam filtering. I would say it would have a hard time passing more than 1 message a minute. I would think that most spammers would give up and go abuse an open proxy somewhere, they're much more plentiful and less cluefully tended.
Current thread:
- EFF whitepaper Sean Donelan (Nov 14)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Paul Vixie (Nov 14)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Steven Champeon (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper J.D. Falk (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Tom (UnitedLayer) (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Steven Champeon (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Tom (UnitedLayer) (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Steven Champeon (Nov 15)
- Staying on topic (was Re: EFF whitepaper) Steve Gibbard (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Rich Kulawiec (Nov 16)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Paul G (Nov 16)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 16)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Steven Champeon (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Paul Vixie (Nov 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: EFF whitepaper Peering (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Richard Welty (Nov 15)