Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

Then I think that needs to be addressed at the RIPE level.  ARIN certainly
made me prove that I had a unique routing policy and multiple peering
connections.  They wanted letters from the ISPs involved stating that yes,
I had a peering (or transit) relationship with them.

Owen


--On Sunday, November 28, 2004 8:14 PM +0100 Cliff Albert <cliff () oisec net> 
wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 10:56:31AM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> > > As I also stated in my last post (which you snipped out, and is pretty
> > > relevant) is that the handing out of ASN's should be harder. Currently
> > > ASN's are given to every silly dude that says 'i want multihoming'.
> > >
> > This simply isn't true.  It was true several years ago, but, is not true
> > now.  (At least for ARIN.  I don't know what the policies are elsewhere).
>
> I am looking from a RIPE point of view. Lately I see ISPs popping out of
> the ground requesting ASNs and having actually only 1 upstream (there
> are 2 upstreams in the routing database, but in the real world there is
> only 1 upstream).
>
> --
> Cliff Albert <cliff () oisec net>



--
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.

Attachment: _bin
Description: