Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>]

On 28-nov-04, at 21:45, Cliff Albert wrote:

> > Reclaiming AS numbers is a waste of time. We need to move beyond 16
> > bits at some point anyway.

> I think it's not. The problem will not go away then, it will just take
> longer before it appears again. The policies have to get stricter, 
> there
> is no point in 'fixing' your problems by not fixing the issue that
> created them in the first place.

Well, how many AS numbers would you like to give out? 30000 in 20 
years? 100k a year? A million in a month? 32 bits will then give you 
2863 millennia, 429 centuries or 357 years, respectively.

> > Oh, and just for fun: tell me if you see AS12945 in your routing 
> > table.
> > I can assure you that this AS number was assigned and is still used in
> > full compliance with RIPE policies.

> * 195.193.163.0/24        195.69.144.125                12945 I

> As you can see there is evidence to substantiate your claim. That you
> have no route: object and are advertising UUNet space under another ASN
> to specific peers is something else.

This AS is only visible to around 20 peers.  :-)  Apparently you're one 
of them although I have no idea which one. The other peculiarities are 
to avoid taking up space in the global routing table, which would be 
more work but provide no benefits.