nanog mailing list archives
Re: Distributed Dictonary email slam
From: Matt Hess <mhess () solarius org>
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 23:43:00 -0600
I completely agree, indeed it does not.. which is why we have now dropped doing secondary mx for this domain.
Anyway.. thanks to all who responded on and off list.. gave me a few good ideas to tinker with..
Probably the most notable thing from this is the technical level with which spammers are now employing such a distributed network of spamming zombie type systems in a very directed manner.. and I always pictured them as drooling slobs that stare at blinking lights..
;) Randy Bush wrote:
Impossible as the customer does not wish to give us a list.You want to keep a list of valid accounts on the secondary so you can refuse mail for non-existing accounts on the secondary too.anyway, as they say, that does not scale randy --- Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Current thread:
- Distributed Dictonary email slam Matt Hess (Sep 05)
- Re: Distributed Dictonary email slam Christopher X. Candreva (Sep 05)
- Re: Distributed Dictonary email slam Matt Hess (Sep 05)
- Re: Distributed Dictonary email slam Randy Bush (Sep 05)
- Re: Distributed Dictonary email slam Matt Hess (Sep 05)
- Re: Distributed Dictonary email slam Matt Hess (Sep 05)
- Re: Distributed Dictonary email slam Jared Mauch (Sep 06)
- Re: Distributed Dictonary email slam Christopher X. Candreva (Sep 06)
- Re: Distributed Dictonary email slam Paul Jakma (Sep 06)
- Re: Distributed Dictonary email slam Christopher X. Candreva (Sep 05)
- Re: Distributed Dictonary email slam Barney Wolff (Sep 05)