nanog mailing list archives
Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:30:48 -0400
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:10:54 +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum said:
And where in the packet does it show that the packet comes from someone who has said permission?
Well, if you didn't have permission, you're probably up to no good and should be setting the appropriate bits as per RFC3514....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden, (continued)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steven Champeon (Apr 29)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 28)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steven Champeon (Apr 29)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 29)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steven Champeon (Apr 29)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Nicholas Suan (Apr 30)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Adi Linden (Apr 28)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 28)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Adi Linden (Apr 28)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 28)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 28)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 28)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 28)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Mark Newton (Apr 26)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 27)
- Message not available
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Bill Stewart (Apr 27)