nanog mailing list archives
Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure
From: "Elmar K. Bins" <elmi () 4ever de>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:15:03 +0200
fw () deneb enyo de (Florian Weimer) wrote:
As always: Never trust a statistic you have not faked yourself ...I doubt that DENIC will ever publish the technical part of its bid, so this isn't convincing.
Like you already admitted on the DENIC list, this has of course been made public, since the largest parts of all proposals can be found on the ICANN web site. DENIC's proposal can be found here: http://www.icann.org/tlds/net-rfp/applications/denic.htm Elmar.
Current thread:
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure John Levine (Mar 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Alexander Koch (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Bill Woodcock (Apr 01)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Randy Bush (Apr 01)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Elmar K. Bins (Apr 02)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Daniel Roesen (Apr 02)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Bill Woodcock (Apr 01)