nanog mailing list archives
Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 08:54:18 +0530
On 4/27/05, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) <fergdawg () netzero net> wrote:
I've been there -- I know how I feel about it -- but I'd love to know how ISP operations folk feel about this.
He's right. ISPs owe it to their users, if not to the rest of the Internet community, to do this. A lot of it is also part of the MAAWG bcps on spam (though the BCPs, when implemented, will do a lot more good than just cut down on spam) -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 26)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 26)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 26)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steve Sobol (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Bill Stewart (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steve Sobol (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steven J. Sobol (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Mark Newton (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steve Sobol (Apr 28)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 26)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 26)