Re: New N.Y. Law Targets Hidden Net LD Tolls

[Jeff Shultz <jeffshultz () wvi com>]

John Levine wrote:
> > > That's why some states (e.g. Texas) require that all toll calls be
> > > dialed as 1+ _regardless of area code_, and local calls cannot be
> > > dialed as 1+.  If you dial a number wrong, you get a message
> > > telling you how to do it properly (and why).
>
>
> > In some places that "solution" is _not_practical_.  As in where the same
> > three digit sequence is in use as a C.O. 'prefix', *and* as an areacode.
> > (an where, in some 'perverse' situations, the foreign area-code is a 
> > 'non-toll' call, yet the bare prefix within the areacode is a toll call.
>
>
> Oh, it works technically, local is 10D, toll is 1+10D, but since they
> don't have permissive dialing, Texans have to memorize lists of local
> prefixes in order to be able to use their phones.  Way to go.
>
> I agree that life would be simpler if there were some straightforward
> way to ask telcos whether a call from a->b was local or toll.
>
> R's,
> John

Part of the problem is EAS (Extended Area Service), where for a flat 
rate (anywhere from $3-$13 that I've seen) your "local calling area" is 
greatly increased. The problem is that if you don't get the flat rate 
plan, it's a toll charge... all without having to dial the 1- 
(everything here is already 10D). Fortunately we are part of a local 
phone company, so checking on the EAS status of customers and making 
sure they get the appropriate numbers is easy.

But we still make mistakes - and I'm sure it's very easy for other ISPs 
to give a new customer a number that's just in the "big city" next door 
(around 5-10 miles away), but is an EAS toll call.

Personally I think they ought to make flat rate EAS mandatory and just 
roll the cost into the phone bill.

--
Jeff Shultz