nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture
From: Peter Dambier <peter () peter-dambier de>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:33:09 +0200
Why not create a special taskforce to research implementing RFC 2549 - IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service considdering the dodo or alternatively achaeopteryx (both extinct)? It is about wasting taxpayers money while watching china deploy IPv9. We do not need IPv6. We do not need P2P serverers for everybody. We do not need worldnews. IPv4 is good enuf for us. 127.0.0.1 is the only ip we really need. We need a strong gouvernement and free tv for everybody. Lets go to China :) After toying a bit with Eudora I found out it was working - really! How about IPv6? It is working. Everybody can use it - even with windows! How about http://www.inaic/index.php?p=manual-upgrade http://www.inaic/index.php?p=internet2-tool It is working! People use it! IPSs use it! Even countries are changing! In the Middle ages, if they ever existed in the first place, church was doing research. Today we have to do it ourselves. Radio was not invented by gouvernment, only hindered. The automobile was not invented by gouvernement only licensed and taxed. Regards - and have a nice weekend Peter and karin Dambier Michael.Dillon () btradianz com wrote:
I guess I'm not the only one who thinks that we could benefit from some fundamental changes to Internet architecture.http://www.wired.com/news/infostructure/0,1377,68004,00.html?tw=wn_6techheadDave Clark is proposing that the NSF should fund a new demonstration network that implements a fundamentally new architecture at many levels.
-- Peter and Karin Dambier Public-Root Graeffstrasse 14 D-64646 Heppenheim +49-6252-671788 (Telekom) +49-6252-750308 (VOiP: sipgate.de) +49-179-108-3978 (O2 Genion) +1-360-226-6583-9563 (INAIC) mail: peter () peter-dambier de http://iason.site.voila.fr http://www.kokoom.com/iason
Current thread:
- Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Michael . Dillon (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Daniel Roesen (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Michael . Dillon (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Daniel Roesen (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Michael . Dillon (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Simon Waters (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture John Dupuy (Jul 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 03)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture John Dupuy (Jul 05)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture John Dupuy (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Daniel Roesen (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Lixia Zhang (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Eric Gauthier (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture David Andersen (Jul 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture John Kristoff (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Chris Kilbourn (Jul 01)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Randy Bush (Jul 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 03)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture J.D. Falk (Jul 03)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 03)
- Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture John Kristoff (Jul 01)