nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:17:30 -0400
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:48:13 EDT, "Geo." said:
What ongoing support, just put the fixes on an ftp site. Cisco's problem is they aren't patches, they are full versions. If they created an exe file that attached via tcp/ip to the router and just changed the bits that needed
The ability to connect to the router and push a software change? Let's think this through a bit, shall we? ;)
Perhaps after a few router worms it will make more sense.
Your mail header says: X-mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 Now, what were you saying about a few worms causing *ANY* change in behavior? ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Cisco and the tobacco industry J. Oquendo (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Jared Mauch (Jul 28)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry Geo. (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Jared Mauch (Jul 28)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry Geo. (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Leo Bicknell (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Daniel Golding (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Geo. (Jul 29)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 29)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Geo. (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Owen DeLong (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Geo. (Jul 31)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Geo. (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Brad Knowles (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Geo. (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Roy Badami (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry JC Dill (Jul 30)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry Geo. (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Brad Knowles (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Jared Mauch (Jul 28)